Referências Bibliográficas

1

MORROW-TESCH, J.; DAILEY, J. W.; JIANG, H. A video data base system for studying animal behavior. Journal of Animal Science, v. 76, n. 10, p. 2605-2608, 1998.

2

NOLDUS, L. P.; SPINK, A. J.; A.J, R. Tegelenbosch computerised video tracking, movement analysis and behaviour recognition in insects. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, v. 35, p. 201-227, 2002.

3

SPRUIJT, B. M. et al. Automatic behavior recognition: what do we want to recognize and how do we measure it? In: Proceedings of Measuring Behavior. Groningen, Netherlands: [s.n.], 1998. p. 264-266.

4

NOLDUS, L. P.; SPINK, A. J.; TEGELENBOSCH, R. A. Ethovision: a versatile video tracking system for automation of behavioral experiments. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, v. 33, n. 3, p. 398-414, 2001.

5

ESHKOL, N.; WACHMANN, A. Movement notation. Weiden & Nicholson, 1958.

6

FENTRESS, J. C. Dynamic boundaries of patterned behaviour: Interaction and self-organization. In: P. P. Bateson and R. A. Hinde (Ed.) Growing Points in Ethology. Cambridge, U.K.: [s.n.], 1976.

7

FENTRESS, J. C. Emergence of pattern in the development of mammalian movement sequences. Journal Neurobiol, v. 23, p. 1529-1556, 1992.

8

GOLANI, I.; FENTRESS, J. C. Early ontogeny of face groomingin mice. Developmental Psychobiol, v. 18, p. 529-544, 1985.

9

SPINK, A. J. et al. The ethovision video tracking system - a tool for behavioral phenotyping of transgenic mice. Physiology Behavior, v. 73, n. 5, p. 731-44, 2001.

10

GAPENNE, O.; SIMON, P.; LANNOU, J. A simple method for recording the path of a rat in an open field. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, v. 22, p. 443-448, 1990.

11

CLARKE, R. L.; SMITH, R. F.; JUSTESEN, D. R. A programmable proximity-contact sensor to detect location or locomotion of animals. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, v. 24, p. 515-518, 1992.

12

M.TARPY, R.; J.MURCEK, R. An electronic device for detecting activity in caged rodents. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, v. 16, p. 383-387, 1984.

13

AKAKA, W. H.; HOUCK, B. A. The use of an ultrasonic monitor for recording locomotor activity. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, v. 12, p. 514-516, 1980.

14

MARTIN, P. H.; UNWIN, D. M. A microwave doppler radar activity monitor. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, v. 20, p. 404-407, 1988.

15

MARTIN, B. R.; PRESCOTT, W. R.; ZHU, M. Quantification of rodent catalepsy by a computer-imaging technique. Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior, v. 43, p. 381-386, 1992.

16

DERRY, J. F.; ELLIOTT, J. H. Automated 3-d tracking of a video-captured movement using the example of an aquatic mollusk. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, v. 29, p. 353-357, 1997.

17

SPRUIJT, B. M.; GISPEN, W. H. Prolonged animal observations by use of digitized videodisplays. Pharmacol, Biochem Behav, v. 19, p. 765-769, 1983.

18

BURESOVA, O.; BOLHUIS, J. J.; BURES, J. Differential effects of cholinergic blockade on performance of rats in the water tank navigation task and in a radial water maze. Behavior Neuroscience, v. 100, p. 476-482, 1986.

19

SPRUIJT, B. M. et al. Org2766 improves performance of rats with unilateral lesions in the fimbria fornix in a spatial learning task. Brain Research, v. 527, p. 192-197, 1990.

20

WHALSTEN, D. Standardizing tests of mouse behavior: reasons, recommendations, and reality. Physiology & Behavior, v. 73, n. 5, p. 695-704, 2001.

21

BROWN, R. E.; STANFORD, L.; SCHELLINCK, H. M. Developing standardized behavioral tests for knockout and inbred mice. Institute for Laboratory Animal Research, v. 41, p. 163-174, 2000.

22

DRAI, D. et al. Phenotyping of mouse exploratory behavior. In: Proceedings of Measuring Behavior. Nijmegen, Amsterdam: [s.n.], 2000. p. 86-88.